Avowa connects to your AI stack, captures the evidence behind your claims, and answers the AI section of enterprise security reviews — with proof, not promises.
Live systems → graded evidence → a review the buyer can check
Buyers now ask about AI as standard: AI governance is in the 2026 SIG, and the Cloud Security Alliance published AI-CAIQ in late 2025. Questionnaire tools help vendors answer — but every answer is still the vendor’s own word, and a reviewer cannot accept that. So the deal waits.
“Yes — AES-256, on Azure, keys in a FIPS 140-2 KMS.”
— the vendor’s word, as typed.
“AES-256, provider-managed — observed live in MongoDB Atlas, us-east-1, today.”
— system-verified · L3 · re-checked on a schedule.
Questionnaires produce answers. Avowa produces evidence.
One evidence base, reused on every review and mapped across the frameworks your buyers ask about — SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, GDPR.
Your IT admin grants read-only access to cloud, identity, code and data stores — and, if you choose, a runtime SDK in your inference path. Metadata only, never customer data.
Avowa observes the signals behind each claim and reads the SOC 2 or ISO reports you already have. Every claim is graded L1–L4 by how it was established. Anything that contradicts a live signal is flagged, and a draft or expired report never counts.
Publish a live trust page — free — answer questionnaires from the same evidence, and give buyers a signed receipt they can verify without us.
L1 self-attested · L2 documented · L3 observed in your running systems · L4 independently attested — each with provenance and a date. Read the published grading rules →
Our own trust page is generated from our own connected systems. It shows what we have proven and what we have not — and we have not earned our own seal yet, because the evidence is not there. That is the product working.
See Avowa’s trust page →Where you connect the runtime SDK, Avowa reads the call itself — not the settings around it. For agents, the record shows what ran, not just what was allowed.
An agent granted tools it never touches is a different risk from one that uses them. Avowa shows the difference — and standing authority nobody uses surfaces as a finding.
A questionnaire records what you said. Avowa records what your systems showed — and when. Each closed month is frozen in a signed trust report, so what a buyer saw in March still reads the same in December.
Illustrative. A history like this cannot be back-filled — which is why it is worth starting now.
We charge for operating the evidence — not for the evidence itself. Publish free, forever; pay when you want your claims proven continuously against your live systems.
Scales with connected systems and legal entities — never with how many claims you make.
Not a vCISO. We run the evidence operation — not your security programme.
Your plan buys capability; your seal comes from what your evidence shows. The engine that awards it cannot read your plan.
Published and honest — your claims stand as your word until evidence backs them.
Most of your verifiable claims observed in your own running systems, against published criteria.
Breadth across domains, claims corroborated by independent systems, and nothing gone stale.
Independent (L4) attestation comes from assurance partners, never from us — and no seal requires it. How seals are awarded →
The vendor proves once. The buyer checks instead of re-asking — and asks its other vendors for the same proof.
Not a tier we have not built — a decision. Buyers are how vendors arrive, and a buyer who paid us to check would have reason to wonder what the answer was worth. Vendors pay, and we publish their gaps anyway.
Connect a system in 15 minutes and watch your trust profile build from live evidence.