Avowa connects to your AI stack, captures the evidence behind your claims, and answers the AI section of enterprise security reviews with evidence from your running systems.
Live systems → graded evidence → a review the buyer can check
Buyers now ask about AI as standard: AI governance is in the 2026 SIG, and the Cloud Security Alliance published AI-CAIQ in late 2025. Questionnaire tools help vendors answer. But every answer is still the vendor’s own word, and a reviewer cannot accept that. So the deal waits.
“We only use Anthropic models.”
The vendor’s word, as typed.
1,204 calls to api.openai.com this week.
Flagged as a contradiction, before your buyer finds it.
Illustrative example.
Your evidence is mapped across the frameworks your buyers ask about: SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, GDPR.
Your IT admin grants read-only access to cloud, identity, code and data stores and, if you choose, a runtime SDK in your inference path. Avowa reads metadata only. It does not read customer data.
Avowa observes the signals behind each claim and reads the SOC 2 or ISO reports you already have. Every claim is graded L1–L4 by how it was established, and anything a live signal contradicts is flagged.
Publish a live trust page (free), answer questionnaires from the same evidence, and give buyers a signed receipt they can verify without us.
L1 self-attested · L2 documented · L3 observed in your running systems · L4 independently attested. Each comes with provenance and a date. Read the published grading rules →
Our own trust page is generated from our own connected systems. We earned our Verified seal from evidence, the same way any vendor does, and the page still shows everything we have not proven yet.
See Avowa’s trust page →Where you connect the runtime SDK, Avowa reads each AI call directly instead of inferring from configuration. For agents, the record shows what actually ran as well as what was permitted.
An agent granted tools it never touches is a different risk from one that uses them. Avowa shows which is which, and flags standing access that nobody uses.
A questionnaire records what you said. Avowa records what your systems showed, and when. Each closed month is frozen in a signed trust report, so what a buyer saw in March still reads the same in December.
Illustrative. A history like this cannot be back-filled, which is why it is worth starting now.
Publishing your trust page is free. You pay when you want your claims proven continuously against your live systems.
Priced by connected systems and legal entities. The number of claims does not change the price.
Scope: we run your evidence operation. Your security programme stays with your team.
Your plan sets what Avowa can do for you. The seal depends only on what your evidence shows, and the engine that awards it has no access to your plan.
Your claims are published as your own statements until evidence backs them.
Most of your verifiable claims observed in your own running systems, against published criteria.
Verified evidence, corroborated and current, plus an independent CPA's attestation, in date.
Independent (L4) attestation comes only from licensed CPA firms; Avowa does not attest. Verified does not require it, and Assured always does. How seals are awarded →
The vendor proves once. Every buyer checks the same evidence instead of sending another questionnaire.
Vendors pay for Avowa, and a paying vendor’s gaps are still published.
